Smoking Causes Spine Problem
July 2nd 2009 23:27
The bad effects of smoking to our health are typically well identified such as lung cancer, liver and heart problem, genital dysfunction etc. Furthermore, habitual smoking can also cause severe damage to your spine. Recent research shows those chain-smoker people are most likely suffer from back pain. Though tobacco is not always the cause but the unhealthy life style of a person involve in smoking can also worsen the case.
An extensive research made by one of the well known university in the US-- undeniably confirmed the relationship between smoking and emergent Lumbar Spondylosis or a spine degeneration, neck and back pain. In an ongoing Clinical investigation, they found out that those medical practitioners who are involved in daily smoking habit and with higher cholesterol level are evidently suffering from spine and muscular pain.
So the next time you want to smoke, better think first the possible bad result of smoking to your health. As the cigarette companies remind us: “Cigarette smoking is dangerous to your health.” Meaning smoking can lead to death. Yes folks, it causes you many diseases. So before anything else…quit smoking. Seek help from your doctor on how you can completely stop it.
| 78 |
| Vote |
Subscribe to this blog










Comment by hazius
home with hazius
But why is it that cigarette smoke causes all the lung/smoke-related diseases and not plug-in air fresheners, car exhausts, smoke stacks, corporate pollution, CITY LIVING?
I saw a show on TV where a surgeon opened up a patient and said, "Yep, city lungs."
Why isn't 'that' shown on public awareness adds?
Why do some little kids get lung cancer?
Why are there old people who smoke?
Why do the Japanese, who have a high smoking/per capita rate, have a relatively low lung-cancer rate?
It's been suggested that their diet of green tea and fish may explain it.
Or perhaps they don't have the gene that's been recently identified in a proportion of the population, which dramatically increases the chances of lung-cancer?
Why aren't these things discussed too?
It's time the 'what's bad for you' argument starts getting objective.